IntellivisionRevolution Forums
Welcome to the official IntellivisionRevolution Forum!

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

IntellivisionRevolution Forums
Welcome to the official IntellivisionRevolution Forum!
IntellivisionRevolution Forums
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
IntellivisionRevolution Forums

Official Forum

Log in

I forgot my password



Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking reddit      




Bookmark and share the address of IntellivisionRevolution Forums on your social bookmarking website

Who is online?
In total there are 40 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 40 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 189 on Sun 22 Sep 2013, 8:05 am
RSS feeds

Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


The Intellivision Forums
Statistics
We have 463 registered users
The newest registered user is greenturtle39

Our users have posted a total of 4155 messages in 882 subjects
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

The Intellivision Forums

You are not connected. Please login or register

Revisionist History

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Revisionist History Empty Revisionist History Fri 15 Mar 2013, 8:12 pm

sloan

sloan
Moderator
Moderator

OK, I have read many times that Nintendo originally offered USA marketing rights for Famicom/NES to Atari. In a historical blunder, Atari declined.

This made me wonder what if...

Would 7800 and XEGS have been released? Would 2600 games have been released into the early 90's? Would NES have been anywhere near as successful as it ultimately became in the states? Would Sega and NEC have had any greater success with Master System and Turbografx consoles respectively?

Lots of questions.

2Revisionist History Empty Re: Revisionist History Sat 16 Mar 2013, 10:17 am

TrekMD

TrekMD
Moderator
Moderator

That's a lot of questions! If the NES had been branded as an Atari console, I don't believe Atari would have released the 7800. The XEGS, maybe, as it was also meant to be used as a computer. Could it have been as successful? Good question. Atari wasn't making wise decisions at the time (as this historical blunder demonstrates, among others), so they may have screwed up marketing. That is, unless the agreement with Nintendo had something to say about how it would be marketed.

Since the NES revived the home gaming industry in the US, it is possible that things may have progressed as we know if an Atari-branded NES had been released.

https://plus.google.com/+EugenioAngueira

3Revisionist History Empty Re: Revisionist History Sat 16 Mar 2013, 5:31 pm

sloan

sloan
Moderator
Moderator

I agree about Atari maybe screwing up the marketing of NES. With Jack Tramiel at the helm, who knows what might have happened? It is weird, though, that Mattel actually had marketing rights for NES in Europe. Was Nintendo somehow afraid of marketing such a popular system outside of Japan? I don't understand why.

4Revisionist History Empty Re: Revisionist History Sat 16 Mar 2013, 8:14 pm

TrekMD

TrekMD
Moderator
Moderator

I think they were looking for established names to sell their product, for whatever reason. In the end, it worked out well for them to sell the product under their own brand.

https://plus.google.com/+EugenioAngueira

5Revisionist History Empty Re: Revisionist History Mon 18 Mar 2013, 11:28 am

onthinice

onthinice
Star Fighter
Star Fighter

I look to Sega's handling of the Master System. Tonka had the rights to sell the consoles. Sega seeing the writing on the walls wisely decided to take back over when the contract was up. Too late for the Master System but on the plus side lesson learned when releasing the Genesis/Mega Drive.

Same might have been true with Atari and Nintendo. The Snes might have saved the Nes.

Wonder if Sony had released the Nintendo Playstation, if they would have had the same problems.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum